The cover up of clerical child abuse “the problem of one country” says the Vatican

4

Its Christmas Eve and I have just done two radio interviews for the BBC following the resignation of the Bishop of Kildare. Bishop Moriarty resigned four weeks after the publication of the report of the Commission of Investigation into child abuse in the Archdiocese of Dublin.

He was the second bishop to resign, Donal Murray quit last week and three further bishops, Eamonn Walsh, Raymond Field and Martin Drennan are under increasing pressure to resign their positions.

The report was damning in its view of how the Catholic Church managed child abuse by its priests. It didn’t simply find that individual bishops had mismanaged cases; it found that there had been a deliberate cover up in an effort to protect the institution, its money and its interests.

The Commission has no doubt that clerical child sexual abuse was covered up by the Archdiocese of Dublin and other Church authorities over much of the period covered by the Commission’s remit. The structures and rules of the Catholic Church facilitated that cover-up. The State authorities facilitated the cover up by not fulfilling their responsibilities to ensure that the law was applied equally to all and allowing the Church institutions to be beyond the reach of the normal law enforcement processes. The welfare of children, which should have been the first priority, was not even a factor to be considered in the early stages. Instead the focus was on the avoidance of scandal and the preservation of the good name, status and assets of the institution and of what the institution regarded as its most important members – the priests.

Noteworthy is the mention of “other Church authorities” and the finding that “the structures and rules of the Catholic Church facilitated that cover-up”. The Commission clearly believes that the cover up extends beyond the Archdiocese of Dublin and is the result of established Roman Catholic Church rules and structures. And who is responsible for Church rules and structures? The Vatican is of course and the supreme pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Benedict XVI.

So what has the response of the Vatican been to the Murphy Report? Well, the Pope has expressed his disgust and outrage at the content of the report. Mind you given the fact that he was responsible for the management of clerical child sexual abuse within the global church for the best part of two decades it can’t have been the detail of the abuse that “outraged” him, he must have been very familiar with that already. Perhaps it was the criticism of the institution that alarmed him? No doubt we will hear more in his upcoming pastoral letter to the Irish Church due sometime next year.

Whist we wait for that stunning moment though we do have other indicators of the Pope’s view of the scandal. Yesterday he gave his annual address to the Roman Curia (the global church government departments) yesterday. This event is akin to a ‘State of the Union’ address, an annual speech which addresses the important events in the life of the church over the preceding year.

Given the findings of both the Ryan and Murphy Reports, both published this year, one might have reasonably expected the Pope to address the issue of child abuse by priests and the now established fact that his church has grossly mismanaged such abuse. But he did not.

Not important enough clearly.

A Vatican spokesperson explained that no special significance can be attached to the Pope’s failure to mention the abuse scandals. The Irish Times covers the story – Link here.

Fr Lombardi said it would be wrong to attribute any significance to this, saying the pope would shortly be dealing with Ireland in the relatively unprecedented context of a “pastoral letter” to the “faithful in Ireland”.

“This speech is . . . not intended as a speech that will cover all the events of the year . . . As for Ireland, the pope will have plenty to say about the Irish church in his forthcoming pastoral letter to the Irish faithful. You will have plenty to reflect on in that document.”

Fr Lombardi also said the speech to the curia was addressed to the “universal church”.

“It’s obvious that the Irish church’s problems are very serious, there is a very dramatic situation there. However, this is really the specific problem of one country.”

So there we have it. It’s our problem you see. A local issue and not something worthy of mention in the context of the “universal” church.

So the scandals haven’t been an issue anywhere else at all really. Not in the US, Canada, Australia, the UK, not in France despite the conviction of a Bishop there for failing to report abuse, not in Brazil where up to ten percept of Roman Catholic priests have been accused of sexual misconduct.

No, not in any of those places…just here.

Fair enough so.

So all we need is the wise counsel of Benedict XVI in the form of his pastoral letter and we will surely learn how to redeem ourselves and find our way back to goodness.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Related Posts

No related posts.

Comments

4 Responses to “The cover up of clerical child abuse “the problem of one country” says the Vatican”
  1. Sharon Green says:

    Dear Colm,

    I’m just so glad you’re out there. It’s so hard for sexual abuse sufferers to be heard and can be a very lonely place. Everything you say is so sound and honourable. I heard you on the radio recently, then bought and read Beyond Belief. Such a brilliant expose. I’d felt for years that sexual abuse was the ‘hidden’ in society and now you’re uncovering one of the major deniers of it. Thank you for what you’ve done, it’s made my journey that bit more honourable. I feel validated and less stigmatised now. Really, keep up the good work; lord knows how we need you.

    As for the Roman Catholic Church? There can be no grace in their behaviour, only hiding and oppressive practice.
    Thank you.

  2. corneilius says:

    “It’s obvious that the Irish church’s problems are very serious, there is a very dramatic situation there. However, this is really the specific problem of one country.”” Fr Lombardi opines.

    Political spin from a cleric?

    Does not the past behaviour of the Church, in Ireland and everywhere else, amount to pretty much the same? An attempt to cloud the issue, using language, position and power to ‘protect’ ones interests … irrespective of the cost to those harmed by policy. And is this behaviour admitted by The Irish Government without a hint of hypocrisy? Hardly.

    People must understand both the lived experience, and the societal drivers that affect the lived experience, in order to resolve this situation, and not look to apportion blame in order to seek ‘justice’ , but to seek full accountability before the courts, and before each other and be prepared to make profound changes in the ways in which institutional and personal power is exercised across society.

    • corneilius says:

      I want to make clear that I am NOT saying there is no blame here, but that the blame must be shared by all those who are responsible for abuse, those who acted it out, those who protected them, those who silence or ignore or diminish the cries of the abused and those who refuse to face the facts of the ubiquity of child abuse in our so called ‘civilised’ society…

      Cycles of abuse exist because of a refusal to acknowledge the ubiquity of abuse and because abuse is Government policy…. as past and current history clearly shows this to be true… The Irish Governments protection of the Church and their acceptance of rendition flights, of the use of Shannon airport as a staging post for US troop movements to Iraq and Afghanistan are part of these cycles of abuse..

      What is happening in Erris with the Shell Gas project is also abuse.

      I find the moral cowardice of Government to be the single most terrifying aspect of modern life….

  3. Rod Cartner says:

    Just back from two weeks in Ireland and learned a lot more of the ’scandals’ which I found horrific. What is amazing is that there has been no ’spin off’ re the RC hierarchy in the UK. The same arrogance is shared by the local Bishop in the Diocese of Lancaster – not with regard to abuse I might add – but by a general negative attitude to anyone daring to challenge his authority.

    Can anyone really accept that these church ‘leaders’ are the true successors of the apostles?

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

wp_footer();